Skip to main content

West Virginia’s Healthcare Transport Networks

Click Here for PDF

Transportation is a well-established community driver of health (PDF) linked to numerous rural health disparities. This Science and Technology Note discusses West Virginia’s existing non-emergency healthcare transportation systems e.g., senior centers and faith based organizations.

Research Highlights

  • West Virginia’s rugged terrain, healthcare workforce shortages, and sparse public transit exacerbate healthcare access issues, particularly in rural and underserved communities.
  • Addressing transportation barriers is crucial to tackling rural health disparities, improving health outcomes, and reducing healthcare costs.
  • Illustrative policy options include:
    • Establish membership-based pilot programs and non-profit collaboratives to coordinate transportation services to capitalize on local knowledge and increase patient appointment utilization
    • Implement a coordinated fare and schedule system that would streamline scheduling, fill gaps in access, and utilize financial resources more efficiently
    • Modify West Virginia’s existing Medicaid NEMT delivery model to a regional or mixed model for better flexibility and tailored solutions that target patients with chronic disease

Healthcare, Transportation, and West Virginia Geography

Many West Virginians are not within a 30-minute drive of a primary care provider (PDF). Further, about 9% of West Virginia’s households do not own a vehicle. This lack of transportation access may lead West Virginians to forgo healthcare altogether.

Primary care sites and topography

Map depicting areas of West Virginia with no primary care providers within 30-minutes’ drive timeSource: Springer

Note: The map depicts areas of West Virginia with no primary care providers within 30-minutes’ drive time (dark red), a single facility (red), two facilities (light red), or more than two facilities (white).

West Virginia’s public transit providers do not cover the entire state limiting healthcare access. In McDowell and Wyoming Counties, for example, patients facing transportation hurdles were more prone (PDF) to hospitalizations or resorting to emergency care.

Although West Virginians with Medicaid have access to Non-Emergency Medical Transportation (NEMT) services at no cost, many rural West Virginians decide to pay (PDF) out-of-pocket due to inconvenient schedules, infrequent service, and the need to match transit and medical schedules (PDF).

Non-Emergency Care Transportation Options

Despite West Virginia’s relatively small population, it has the nation’s 6th highest (PDF) annual NEMT ride days and the 13th-highest proportion of beneficiaries who use NEMT services in the country. West Virginia’s Medicaid transportation broker, Modivcare, offers free NEMT services, but the policy limits mileage reimbursement to 125 miles or within 30 miles of state borders for medically necessary trips. Additionally, Modivcare, which has an F rating from the Better Business Bureau, has been criticized for reported West Virginia’s Healthcare Transport Networks April 2024wait times, failure to fulfill reservations, and staffing shortages.

County Aging Providers transport thousands of seniors yearly. Faith-based organizations rely on volunteers covered by a liability insurance policy but still face distance, geography, and volunteer availability.

Census tracts where 100 or more households lack vehicle access (in dark green).

Map depicting the number of households in West Virginia and the number of persons per houseData Source: Census ACS 2018-2022

Image Source: US DoT Transportation Insecurity Analysis Tool

Potential Benefits to West Virginia’s Rural Communities Access to Healthcare Transport

Enhancing the reliability of transportation, one of the seven Vital Conditions for Health and Well Being, has the potential to improve the health outcomes of West Virginians and reduce healthcare costs for patients, providers, and taxpayers. In one study, the use of Medicaid NEMT resulted in an average monthly savings of $1,300 per person by avoiding Medicaid costs associated with more intensive or more frequent use of healthcare services.

Illustrative Healthcare Transportation Policy Options

Illustrative Policy Options Challenges and Opportunities
Fund non-profit collaboratives to coordinate transportation services
  • Faith-based organizations and other non-profits could benefit from utilization of the same rider/driver scheduling systems enabling inter-agency referrals and sharing of drivers
  • Seniors, disabled, and rural transportation agency grantees ( 5310/5311) also experience challenges like staffing/volunteer shortages
Implement a coordinated fare and schedule system (PDF) in existing public transit systems
Modify West Virginia Medicaid’s NEMT service delivery model

West Virginia Medical Transportation Services Compared to Other Appalachian States

The initiatives in this table represent innovative and collaborative approaches to addressing transportation in rural settings. Each has demonstrated promising health and financial outcomes.

Initiative Goal Outcomes
West Virginia Medicaid’s statewide broker NEMT service delivery model (PDF) Modivcare aims to provide innovative, technology driven solutions for Medicaid beneficiary transportation
Taylor Regional Hospital's (Kentucky) hospitality van service 14 sponsor entities, including businesses and community organizations, contribute $80 monthly to Taylor Regional Hospital to provide transportation services
  • Reached residents in four counties that lacked taxi and public transit services
  • Increased appointment utilization for routine follow-ups, dialysis, and cancer treatments
  • Transports 1,100 unique patients each year
Blount County, Tennessee’s SMiles (Senior Miles) Transportation Program Provide seniors with increased freedom and enhanced quality of life through a membership based program that costs riders $49 per year
A Missouri Health Foundation pilot program Use mobility coordinators from a third-party company with local knowledge to educate riders, coordinate transportation services, and train staff on transportation screening
  • Yielded a $7.68 return on investment for every dollar spent 
  • Reduced the number of no-shows

This Science Technology Legislative Note was written by Brandon L. Gregory, MHA, MS Population Health Candidate, WVU School of Public Health, on behalf of the Bridge Initiative for Science and Technology Policy, Leadership, and Communications. Please see https://scitechpolicy.wvu.edu/ or contact scitechpolicy@mail.wvu.edu for more information.

© 2024 West Virginia University. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative License Works 4.0 License.